Not known Details About g shock divers watches
Today, speaking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a class of timepieces that's normally employed for even ten percent of its potential.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", if the individual has secured his wrist to the maximum after a dip and a couple of strokes, return immediately to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use, it's merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of this contemporary era that dates back to the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces the group can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film also winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist turned into a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other with no crown shield shoulders, imitated a bit by everyone.
These are just two of the first cases that show how - fiction or reality - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day that the brands when it came to describing their models began to use the phrase: "suitable for any occasion".
The 007 change, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose function was played with the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their actual use in this large family whose origins would only have to deal with "hard even more than steel", today there are also versions so bejeweled to fear even when you have website to wash the hands.
However, a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically speaking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive philosophies of these fascinating references.
I have a long-standing friend who is an expert diver and that, throughout his diving at the Persian check here Gulf, makes 100 percent of his diving watch - like that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at large depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to guarantee the following performances:
Excellent visibility during the dive
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its motion, either quartz or mechanical
However, the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches must adhere to specific rules such as those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, that which we know is the best, the best sub may be ultimately a watchable to provide features much milder and easier to manage.
I remember that in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that is not so when it is done a trivial swim at the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours could not even rely to a screw-on crown better still when secure on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
And the safety on the waterproof status of this submerged timepieces?
Just for people who'd never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a clear condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the primary reason why even an abyssal super dive watch might need to be hurried into a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on hardly any versions, which honestly I do not understand why.
You may have worn your diving diver's watch in your wrist in order to go to the sea and as a result, after adjusting the moment, have left to twist the crown snugly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily create a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen together a little 'of issues linked to the time that must meet the water, and also given the essential information, I show you which - at least so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I've divided them into two categories. The order in which they appear doesn't signify any ranking.